By Faisal Fayaz
Clearance reciprocity makes a new agency accept your clearance by default. See the seven SEAD 7 exceptions and which re-investigations are actually lawful. Clearance reciprocity makes a new agency accept your existing clearance by default. Here are the seven exceptions that let it re-investigate, and which ones are real. You hold a Secret clearance at one agency. You take a job supporting another. The new agency asks you to start again. Clearance reciprocity is the rule that says it should not, and it works as a default rather than a favour. Security Executive Agent Directive 7 makes agencies accept an existing background investigation and an existing adjudication, then names seven exceptions. Almost every re-investigation a candidate meets is one of those seven. The two that catch most people are an investigation older than seven years and a record the receiving agency cannot see. So the useful question is never whether reciprocity applies. It is which exception the new agency leans on, and whether that exception is real. What Clearance Reciprocity Means Clearance reciprocity has a published definition. SEAD 7 (https://www.dni.gov/files/NCSC/documents/Regulations/SEAD-7 BI ReciprocityU.pdf) took effect on 9 November 2018. It calls reciprocity "the acknowledgement and acceptance of an existing background investigation". The definition also covers the adjudication behind that investigation, and an active eligibility determination another executive branch agency granted. The directive then turns that into two duties. Agencies "shall accept background investigations completed by an authorized investigative agency" that meet all or part of the investigative requirements. Agencies "shall accept national security eligibility adjudications conducted by an authorized adjudicative agency at the same or higher level". Read the second duty closely. Same or higher level does the work. A Secret adjudication carries across as a Secret adjudication. It does not become a Top Secret one because the new contract needs that. The statute behind the directive says the same thing more bluntly. 50 U.S.C. 3341(d) (https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/t50/s3341/) states that all completed background investigations and determinations "shall be accepted by all agencies". It also bars an agency from investigating "where a current investigation or clearance of equal level already exists". The Seven Named Exceptions Section E.2 of the directive lists every lawful reason to refuse reciprocity: - New adjudicative information surfaced since the last investigation - The most recent investigation is more than seven years old - The adjudication carries an exception under SEAD 4 - A Bond Amendment disqualifier applies and the person needs SCI, SAP or restricted data - The Security Executive Agent approved extra ag
Clearance reciprocity makes a new agency accept your existing clearance by default. Here are the seven exceptions that let it re-investigate, and which ones are real.
You hold a Secret clearance at one agency. You take a job supporting another. The new agency asks you to start again. Clearance reciprocity is the rule that says it should not, and it works as a default rather than a favour. Security Executive Agent Directive 7 makes agencies accept an existing background investigation and an existing adjudication, then names seven exceptions. Almost every re-investigation a candidate meets is one of those seven. The two that catch most people are an investigation older than seven years and a record the receiving agency cannot see. So the useful question is never whether reciprocity applies. It is which exception the new agency leans on, and whether that exception is real. What Clearance Reciprocity Means Clearance reciprocity has a published definition. SEAD 7 (https://www.dni.gov/files/NCSC/documents/Regulations/SEAD-7 BI ReciprocityU.pdf) took effect on 9 November 2018. It calls reciprocity "the acknowledgement and acceptance of an existing background investigation". The definition also covers the adjudication behind that investigation, and an active eligibility determination another executive branch agency granted. The directive then turns that into two duties. Agencies "shall accept background investigations completed by an authorized investigative agency" that meet all or part of the investigative requirements. Agencies "shall accept national security eligibility adjudications conducted by an authorized adjudicative agency at the same or higher level". Read the second duty closely. Same or higher level does the work. A Secret adjudication carries across as a Secret adjudication. It does not become a Top Secret one because the new contract needs that. The statute behind the directive says the same thing more bluntly. 50 U.S.C. 3341(d) (https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/t50/s3341/) states that all completed background investigations and determinations "shall be accepted by all agencies". It also bars an agency from investigating "where a current investigation or clearance of equal level already exists". The Seven Named Exceptions Section E.2 of the directive lists every lawful reason to refuse reciprocity: - New adjudicative information surfaced since the last investigation - The most recent investigation is more than seven years old - The adjudication carries an exception under SEAD 4 - A Bond Amendment disqualifier applies and the person needs SCI, SAP or restricted data - The Security Executive Agent approved extra ag
Contact Shaavir · View services · Read the blog · Careers · Case studies · Privacy policy · Terms